Speaker summary
⁠92%1 analyzed article/video18 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Pacific Power officials results contain 1 faulty reasoning type, including Self-Serving Bias, with Self-Serving Bias as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 18 hits. Analysis detected 18 faulty-reasoning hits from 18 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 100% and a BS Rank of ⁠90% (4,790 of 45,410 speakers). This Pacific Power officials is worse (more manipulative) than 89.50% of the peer group.
Pacific Power officials
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%Paul Heideman1%
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Conor Heffernan1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%Katy Longshore1%
⁠90%Pacific Power officials (selected)100%
⁠100%291 Brewhouse100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%2035 Initiative100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
⁠100%1455 Storytelling Arts100%
Speaker details
Total words: 18
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

90% percentile
025507510089.5% percentile
100.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos18 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Speaker 100.0%100.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 3.7%Self-Serving BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos