Speaker summary
⁠86%1 analyzed article/video90.5 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Oregon Zoo results contain 2 faulty reasoning types, including Pessimism Bias, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 79.6% saturation with 72.076 hits. Analysis detected 92.076 faulty-reasoning hits from 90.5 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 48.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠66% (15,084 of 44,059 speakers). This Oregon Zoo is worse (more manipulative) than 65.80% of the peer group.
Oregon Zoo
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%Paul Heideman1%
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Conor Heffernan1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%Katy Longshore1%
⁠66%Oregon Zoo (selected)49%
⁠100%291 Brewhouse100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%2035 Initiative100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
⁠100%1455 Storytelling Arts100%
Speaker details
Total words: 90.5
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

66% percentile
025507510065.8% percentile
48.1% BS Score1 analyzed videos90.5 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–100%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 79.6%79.6%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Speaker 16.5%16.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%Optimism Bias: Speaker 79.6%, sitewide 6.0%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 16.5%, sitewide 1.9%Optimism BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos