Speaker summary
⁠40%3 analyzed articles/videos121 analyzed words
BS Summary: These OC Animal Care results contain 1 faulty reasoning type, including Halo Effect, with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 35.3% saturation with 78 hits. Analysis detected 78 faulty-reasoning hits from 121 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 35.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠57% (19,716 of 45,145 speakers). This OC Animal Care is worse (more manipulative) than 56.30% of the peer group.
OC Animal Care
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%Paul Heideman1%
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Conor Heffernan1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%Katy Longshore1%
⁠57%OC Animal Care (selected)36%
⁠100%291 Brewhouse100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%2035 Initiative100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
⁠100%1455 Storytelling Arts100%
Speaker details
Total words: 121
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

56% percentile
025507510056.3% percentile
35.3% BS Score3 analyzed videos121 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 35.3%35.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Halo Effect: Speaker 35.3%, sitewide 6.7%Halo EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos