Speaker summary
30%6 analyzed articles/videos168 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Oakland Police Department results contain 4 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Negativity Bias, and Status Quo Bias, with Fundamental Attribution Error as the most egregious example at 11.2% saturation with 25 hits. Analysis detected 64 faulty-reasoning hits from 168 analyzed words across 6 articles, generating a BS Score of 7.1% and a BS Rank of 7% (40,754 of 43,720 speakers). This Oakland Police Department is better (less manipulative) than 93.20% of the peer group.
Oakland Police Department
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
0%Paul Heideman1%
0%The Brookings Institution1%
0%Conor Heffernan1%
0%Gen Jack Keane1%
0%Katy Longshore1%
7%Oakland Police Department (selected)8%
100%291 Brewhouse100%
100%21 Grams100%
100%2035 Initiative100%
100%1X representative100%
100%1455 Storytelling Arts100%

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

7% percentile
02550751006.8% percentile
7.1% BS Score6 analyzed videos168 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–25%
0.0%5%10%15%20%25%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 5.8%5.8%Fundamental Attribution E…Sitewide 2.7%Speaker 11.2%11.2%Status Quo BiasSitewide 2.2%Speaker 5.8%5.8%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Speaker 5.8%5.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%5%5%10%10%15%15%20%20%25%25%Negativity Bias: Speaker 5.8%, sitewide 19.2%Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 11.2%, sitewide 2.7%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 5.8%, sitewide 5.3%Status Quo Bias: Speaker 5.8%, sitewide 2.2%Negativity BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate