Speaker summary
⁠93%1 analyzed article/video43 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Nino results contain 6 faulty reasoning types, including Begging the Question, Hindsight Bias, and Anecdotal, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 88.4% saturation with 38 hits. Analysis detected 124 faulty-reasoning hits from 43 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 48.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠66% (15,426 of 45,144 speakers). This Nino is worse (more manipulative) than 65.80% of the peer group.
Nino
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%Paul Heideman1%
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Conor Heffernan1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%Katy Longshore1%
⁠66%Nino (selected)49%
⁠100%291 Brewhouse100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%2035 Initiative100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
⁠100%1455 Storytelling Arts100%
Speaker details
Total words: 43
Article count: 1
Authors
?

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

66% percentile
025507510065.8% percentile
48.1% BS Score1 analyzed videos43 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–100%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 88.4%88.4%Hindsight BiasSitewide 1.4%Speaker 55.8%55.8%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Speaker 55.8%55.8%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 44.2%44.2%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Speaker 32.6%32.6%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Speaker 11.6%11.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%Optimism Bias: Speaker 88.4%, sitewide 6.0%Begging the Question: Speaker 55.8%, sitewide 1.7%Hindsight Bias: Speaker 55.8%, sitewide 1.4%Anecdotal: Speaker 44.2%, sitewide 5.2%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 32.6%, sitewide 3.7%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 11.6%, sitewide 1.9%Optimism BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos