Speaker summary
⁠69%1 analyzed article/video26.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Nicholas Leonard results contain 4 faulty reasoning types, including Burden of Proof, Confirmation Bias, and Negativity Bias, with Pessimism Bias as the most egregious example at 75% saturation with 22.5 hits. Analysis detected 82.5 faulty-reasoning hits from 26.667 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 56.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠76% (11,011 of 45,144 speakers). This Nicholas Leonard is worse (more manipulative) than 75.60% of the peer group.
Nicholas Leonard
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%Paul Heideman1%
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Conor Heffernan1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%Katy Longshore1%
⁠76%Nicholas Leonard (selected)57%
⁠100%291 Brewhouse100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%2035 Initiative100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
⁠100%1455 Storytelling Arts100%
Speaker details
Total words: 26.667
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

76% percentile
025507510075.6% percentile
56.3% BS Score1 analyzed videos26.7 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–100%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Speaker 75.0%75.0%Burden of ProofSitewide 0.4%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 50.0%50.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 75.0%, sitewide 1.9%Burden of Proof: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 0.4%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 7.5%Negativity Bias: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 19.2%Pessimism BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos