Speaker summary
43%1 analyzed article/video32.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Nathan Sayre results contain 8 faulty reasoning types, including Fundamental Attribution Error, Hasty Generalization, and Post Hoc (False Cause), with Confirmation Bias as the most egregious example at 34.7% saturation with 17 hits. Analysis detected 132 faulty-reasoning hits from 32.667 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 33.7% and a BS Rank of 55% (20,451 of 45,123 speakers). This Nathan Sayre is worse (more manipulative) than 54.70% of the peer group.
Nathan Sayre
Speaker details
Ranking context
Position among analyzed speakers
33.7% BS Score1 analyzed videos32.7 analyzed words
Reasoning profile
Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
Sitewide departure map
Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often