Speaker summary
⁠78%1 analyzed article/video53.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Nancy DeBoer results contain 6 faulty reasoning types, including In-Group Bias, Optimism Bias, and Hasty Generalization, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 54.1% saturation with 33.571 hits. Analysis detected 90.851 faulty-reasoning hits from 53.667 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 24.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠43% (26,101 of 45,086 speakers). This Nancy DeBoer is better (less manipulative) than 57.90% of the peer group.
Nancy DeBoer
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%Paul Heideman1%
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Conor Heffernan1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%Katy Longshore1%
⁠43%Nancy DeBoer (selected)25%
⁠100%291 Brewhouse100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%2035 Initiative100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
⁠100%1455 Storytelling Arts100%
Speaker details
Total words: 53.667
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

42% percentile
025507510042.1% percentile
24.7% BS Score1 analyzed videos53.7 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 54.1%54.1%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Speaker 33.1%33.1%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 24.3%24.3%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 17.3%17.3%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 9.2%9.2%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Speaker 10.3%10.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 54.1%, sitewide 15.9%In-Group Bias: Speaker 33.1%, sitewide 6.9%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 24.3%, sitewide 8.1%Optimism Bias: Speaker 17.3%, sitewide 6.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 10.3%, sitewide 3.3%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 9.2%, sitewide 0.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos