Speaker summary
⁠70%1 analyzed article/video57.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Monét Noelle Marshall results contain 5 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Negativity Bias, and Unattributed Quote, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 75% saturation with 48.375 hits. Analysis detected 153.375 faulty-reasoning hits from 57.333 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 39.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠61% (18,048 of 45,369 speakers). This Monét Noelle Marshall is worse (more manipulative) than 60.20% of the peer group.
Monét Noelle Marshall
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%Paul Heideman1%
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Conor Heffernan1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%Katy Longshore1%
⁠61%Monét Noelle Marshall (selected)40%
⁠100%291 Brewhouse100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%2035 Initiative100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
⁠100%1455 Storytelling Arts100%
Speaker details
Total words: 57.333
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

60% percentile
025507510060.2% percentile
39.4% BS Score1 analyzed videos57.3 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–100%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 75.0%75.0%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 36.0%36.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 36.0%36.0%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 36.0%36.0%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 13.9%13.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 75.0%, sitewide 15.9%Framing Effect: Speaker 36.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Speaker 36.0%, sitewide 19.2%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 36.0%, sitewide 1.1%Halo Effect: Speaker 13.9%, sitewide 6.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos