Speaker summary
⁠82%1 analyzed article/video69 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Mike Considine results contain 2 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 69 hits. Analysis detected 110 faulty-reasoning hits from 69 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 79.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠84% (7,591 of 45,096 speakers). This Mike Considine is worse (more manipulative) than 83.20% of the peer group.
Mike Considine
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%Paul Heideman1%
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Conor Heffernan1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%Katy Longshore1%
⁠84%Mike Considine (selected)80%
⁠100%291 Brewhouse100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%2035 Initiative100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
⁠100%1455 Storytelling Arts100%
Speaker details
Total words: 69
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

83% percentile
025507510083.2% percentile
79.7% BS Score1 analyzed videos69 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 59.4%59.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 59.4%, sitewide 15.9%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos