Speaker summary
61%2 analyzed articles/videos81 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Michelle Fischbach results contain 11 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect, Optimism Bias, and Primacy Effect, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 35.8% saturation with 39 hits. Analysis detected 239 faulty-reasoning hits from 81 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 20.7% and a BS Rank of 36% (29,374 of 45,529 speakers). This Michelle Fischbach is better (less manipulative) than 64.50% of the peer group.
Michelle Fischbach
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
0%Paul Heideman1%
0%The Brookings Institution1%
0%Conor Heffernan1%
0%Gen Jack Keane1%
0%Katy Longshore1%
36%Michelle Fischbach (selected)21%
100%291 Brewhouse100%
100%21 Grams100%
100%2035 Initiative100%
100%1X representative100%
100%1455 Storytelling Arts100%
Speaker details
Total words: 81
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

36% percentile
025507510035.5% percentile
20.7% BS Score2 analyzed videos81 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 29.4%29.4%Status Quo BiasSitewide 2.2%Speaker 22.4%22.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 35.8%35.8%Primacy EffectSitewide 0.9%Speaker 18.4%18.4%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 17.4%17.4%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Speaker 18.4%18.4%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 18.4%18.4%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 17.4%17.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 16.5%16.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Speaker 16.5%16.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 35.8%, sitewide 15.9%Halo Effect: Speaker 29.4%, sitewide 6.7%Framing Effect: Speaker 17.4%, sitewide 26.9%Status Quo Bias: Speaker 22.4%, sitewide 2.2%Negativity Bias: Speaker 17.4%, sitewide 19.2%Optimism Bias: Speaker 18.4%, sitewide 6.0%Primacy Effect: Speaker 18.4%, sitewide 0.9%Recency Bias: Speaker 18.4%, sitewide 2.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 17.4%, sitewide 0.8%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 16.5%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 16.5%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos