Speaker summary
33% 3 analyzed articles/videos 6,336.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Meghna Chakrabarti results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority , Framing Effect , and Anecdotal , with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 2.9% saturation with 203.279 hits . Analysis detected 2,169.807 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,336.333 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.2% and a BS Rank of 0% (45,123 of 45,145 speakers). This Meghna Chakrabarti is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. Meghna Chakrabarti
Speaker details
Total words: 6,336.333
Article count: 3
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 1.2% BS Score3 analyzed videos6.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Speaker 2.7% 2.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Speaker 1.5% 1.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Speaker 2.3% 2.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Speaker 2.9% 2.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Speaker 1.0% 1.0% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Speaker 1.4% 1.4% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Speaker 2.0% 2.0% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Speaker 2.1% 2.1% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Speaker 0.8% 0.8% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Speaker 0.6% 0.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Speaker 2.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Speaker 1.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 2.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Speaker 2.9%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Speaker 1.0%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Speaker 2.0%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Speaker 1.4%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Speaker 2.1%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Speaker 2.9%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 0.8%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Speaker 2.3%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 0.6%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Speaker 0.2%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 0.8%, sitewide 3.3% Recency Bias: Speaker 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Speaker 0.6%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Speaker 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Speaker 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Speaker 0.5%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Speaker 1.1%, sitewide 1.7% False Dilemma: Speaker 0.8%, sitewide 1.5% Unattributed Quote: Speaker 0.7%, sitewide 1.1% Straw Man: Speaker 0.5%, sitewide 0.9% Blind-Spot Bias: Speaker 0.8%, sitewide 0.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst