Speaker summary
⁠70%1 analyzed article/video48 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Markus Thomson results contain 3 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect and Quote-first Misdirection, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 75% saturation with 40.5 hits. Analysis detected 112.5 faulty-reasoning hits from 48 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 58.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠77% (10,579 of 44,955 speakers). This Markus Thomson is worse (more manipulative) than 76.50% of the peer group.
Markus Thomson
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%Paul Heideman1%
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Conor Heffernan1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%Katy Longshore1%
⁠77%Markus Thomson (selected)59%
⁠100%291 Brewhouse100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%2035 Initiative100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
⁠100%1455 Storytelling Arts100%
Speaker details
Total words: 48
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

77% percentile
025507510076.5% percentile
58.3% BS Score1 analyzed videos48 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–100%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 75.0%75.0%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 50.0%50.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%Optimism Bias: Speaker 75.0%, sitewide 6.0%Framing Effect: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 26.9%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 0.0%Optimism BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos