Speaker summary
⁠51%2 analyzed articles/videos73 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Mark Sanchez results contain 2 faulty reasoning types, including Ambiguity (Equivocation), with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 72.4% saturation with 92 hits. Analysis detected 116 faulty-reasoning hits from 73 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 45.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠65% (16,009 of 45,159 speakers). This Mark Sanchez is worse (more manipulative) than 64.60% of the peer group.
Mark Sanchez
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%Paul Heideman1%
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Conor Heffernan1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%Katy Longshore1%
⁠65%Mark Sanchez (selected)46%
⁠100%291 Brewhouse100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%2035 Initiative100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
⁠100%1455 Storytelling Arts100%
Speaker details
Total words: 73
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

65% percentile
025507510064.6% percentile
45.7% BS Score2 analyzed videos73 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–100%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 72.4%72.4%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 18.9%18.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%Anecdotal: Speaker 72.4%, sitewide 5.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 18.9%, sitewide 0.8%AnecdotalSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos