Speaker summary
⁠42%1 analyzed article/video110 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Mark Morgan results contain 7 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Anecdotal, and Burden of Proof, with Self-Serving Bias as the most egregious example at 34.5% saturation with 67 hits. Analysis detected 198 faulty-reasoning hits from 110 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 14.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠24% (33,501 of 43,623 speakers). This Mark Morgan is better (less manipulative) than 76.80% of the peer group.
Mark Morgan
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%Paul Heideman1%
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Conor Heffernan1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%Katy Longshore1%
⁠24%Mark Morgan (selected)15%
⁠100%291 Brewhouse100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%2035 Initiative100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
⁠100%1455 Storytelling Arts100%
Speaker details
Total words: 110
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

23% percentile
025507510023.2% percentile
14.6% BS Score1 analyzed videos110 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Speaker 34.5%34.5%Burden of ProofSitewide 0.4%Speaker 12.4%12.4%Sunk Cost EffectSitewide 0.3%Speaker 11.9%11.9%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 12.4%12.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 15.5%15.5%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 7.7%7.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 7.7%7.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 34.5%, sitewide 3.7%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 15.5%, sitewide 11.1%Anecdotal: Speaker 12.4%, sitewide 5.2%Burden of Proof: Speaker 12.4%, sitewide 0.4%Sunk Cost Effect: Speaker 11.9%, sitewide 0.3%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 7.7%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Speaker 7.7%, sitewide 6.0%Self-Serving BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos