Speaker summary
59% 1 analyzed article/video 172.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Mandi Cavano results contain 19 faulty reasoning types, including Ambiguity (Equivocation) , Negativity Bias , and Overconfidence Bias , with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 31.7% saturation with 84 hits . Analysis detected 385.957 faulty-reasoning hits from 172.667 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 8.5% and a BS Rank of 10% (40,854 of 45,145 speakers). This Mandi Cavano is better (less manipulative) than 90.50% of the peer group. Mandi Cavano
Speaker details
Total words: 172.667
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
10% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 9.5% percentile 8.5% BS Score1 analyzed videos172.7 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Speaker 31.7% 31.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Speaker 14.7% 14.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Speaker 4.9% 4.9% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias Sitewide 3.1% Speaker 10.8% 10.8% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Speaker 12.1% 12.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Speaker 12.4% 12.4% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Speaker 14.4% 14.4% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Speaker 11.6% 11.6% Representativeness Heuris… Sitewide 1.9% Speaker 6.4% 6.4% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Speaker 3.0% 3.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Anecdotal: Speaker 31.7%, sitewide 5.2% Negativity Bias: Speaker 12.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 4.9%, sitewide 15.9% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 14.7%, sitewide 0.8% Hasty Generalization: Speaker 14.4%, sitewide 8.1% Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 12.1%, sitewide 4.6% In-Group Bias: Speaker 11.6%, sitewide 6.9% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Speaker 10.8%, sitewide 3.1% Availability Heuristic: Speaker 9.4%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Speaker 3.0%, sitewide 7.5% Representativeness Heuristic: Speaker 6.4%, sitewide 1.9% Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 6.1%, sitewide 3.7% Status Quo Bias: Speaker 6.0%, sitewide 2.2% Burden of Proof: Speaker 4.9%, sitewide 0.4% Loss Aversion: Speaker 4.9%, sitewide 2.5% Anchoring Bias: Speaker 3.0%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 1.5%, sitewide 3.3% Pessimism Bias: Speaker 2.3%, sitewide 1.9% False Dilemma: Speaker 1.1%, sitewide 1.5% Anecdotal Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst