Speaker summary
65% 6 analyzed articles/videos 3,064.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Mahmoud Khalil results contain 43 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Hasty Generalization , and Framing Effect , with Confirmation Bias as the most egregious example at 14.6% saturation with 507.761 hits . Analysis detected 5,047.825 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,064.333 analyzed words across 6 articles and videos, generating a BS Score of 3.3% and a BS Rank of 2% (45,081 of 45,572 speakers). This Mahmoud Khalil is better (less manipulative) than 98.90% of the peer group. Mahmoud Khalil
Speaker details
Total words: 3,064.333
Content count: 6
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
1% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 1.1% percentile 3.3% BS Score6 analyzed videos3.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Speaker 11.1% 11.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Speaker 7.4% 7.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Speaker 2.3% 2.3% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Speaker 14.6% 14.6% Begging the Question Sitewide 1.7% Speaker 7.9% 7.9% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Speaker 0.9% 0.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Speaker 10.2% 10.2% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Speaker 0.6% 0.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Speaker 3.8% 3.8% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Speaker 12.8% 12.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Speaker 11.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Speaker 7.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 10.2%, sitewide 15.9% Confirmation Bias: Speaker 14.6%, sitewide 7.5% Hasty Generalization: Speaker 12.8%, sitewide 8.1% Appeal to Authority: Speaker 2.3%, sitewide 11.1% Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 9.9%, sitewide 5.3% Availability Heuristic: Speaker 3.8%, sitewide 9.1% Begging the Question: Speaker 7.9%, sitewide 1.7% In-Group Bias: Speaker 2.5%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Speaker 0.9%, sitewide 6.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 6.0%, sitewide 3.3% Optimism Bias: Speaker 0.6%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Speaker 2.5%, sitewide 5.2% Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 4.6%, sitewide 2.7% Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 0.2%, sitewide 4.6% False Dilemma: Speaker 4.6%, sitewide 1.5% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Speaker 4.2%, sitewide 3.1% Anchoring Bias: Speaker 0.6%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 1.6%, sitewide 3.7% Indoctrination: Speaker 3.0%, sitewide 0.0% Unattributed Quote: Speaker 3.0%, sitewide 1.1% Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 2.8%, sitewide 0.0% Recency Bias: Speaker 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst