Speaker summary
76% 1 analyzed article/video 148 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Liz Glazer results contain 9 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias , Negativity Bias , and Ambiguity (Equivocation) , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 45% saturation with 75 hits . Analysis detected 391 faulty-reasoning hits from 148 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 24.5% and a BS Rank of 42% (26,506 of 45,529 speakers). This Liz Glazer is better (less manipulative) than 58.20% of the peer group. Liz Glazer
Speaker details
Total words: 148
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
42% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 41.8% percentile 24.5% BS Score1 analyzed videos148 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Speaker SitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0% 20% 40% 60% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Speaker 66.7% 66.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Speaker 45.0% 45.0% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Speaker 18.9% 18.9% Loss Aversion Sitewide 2.5% Speaker 16.7% 16.7% Recency Bias Sitewide 2.7% Speaker 9.9% 9.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Speaker 25.7% 25.7% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Speaker 14.4% 14.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Speaker 14.4% 14.4% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Speaker 9.0% 9.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 20% 20% 40% 40% 60% 60% Confirmation Bias: Speaker 66.7%, sitewide 7.5% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 45.0%, sitewide 15.9% Negativity Bias: Speaker 25.7%, sitewide 19.2% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 18.9%, sitewide 0.8% Loss Aversion: Speaker 16.7%, sitewide 2.5% Availability Heuristic: Speaker 14.4%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Speaker 14.4%, sitewide 8.1% Recency Bias: Speaker 9.9%, sitewide 2.7% Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 9.0%, sitewide 5.3% Confirmation Bias Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst