Speaker summary
⁠60%1 analyzed article/video806.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Lisa Wolford results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Appeal to Authority, and Availability Heuristic, with Overconfidence Bias as the most egregious example at 10.8% saturation with 133 hits. Analysis detected 1,097.41 faulty-reasoning hits from 806.333 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠3% (44,206 of 45,203 speakers). This Lisa Wolford is better (less manipulative) than 97.80% of the peer group.
Lisa Wolford
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%Paul Heideman1%
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Conor Heffernan1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%Katy Longshore1%
⁠3%Lisa Wolford (selected)5%
⁠100%291 Brewhouse100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%2035 Initiative100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
⁠100%1455 Storytelling Arts100%
Speaker details
Total words: 806.333
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

2% percentile
02550751002.2% percentile
4.4% BS Score1 analyzed videos806.3 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 7.7%7.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 2.9%2.9%Dunning-Kruger EffectSitewide 0.1%Speaker 6.8%6.8%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Speaker 10.8%10.8%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 13.0%13.0%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Speaker 3.3%3.3%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 2.7%2.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 4.5%4.5%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 2.2%2.2%Circular ReasoningSitewide 0.1%Speaker 3.1%3.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Speaker 7.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Speaker 2.9%, sitewide 19.2%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 13.0%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 9.9%, sitewide 11.1%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 10.8%, sitewide 4.6%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 6.3%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 4.5%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Speaker 3.3%, sitewide 6.9%Dunning-Kruger Effect: Speaker 6.8%, sitewide 0.1%Optimism Bias: Speaker 2.7%, sitewide 6.0%Anchoring Bias: Speaker 5.9%, sitewide 4.0%Anecdotal: Speaker 2.2%, sitewide 5.2%Begging the Question: Speaker 4.2%, sitewide 1.7%Loss Aversion: Speaker 3.8%, sitewide 2.5%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 3.1%, sitewide 3.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 3.3%, sitewide 0.8%Status Quo Bias: Speaker 3.3%, sitewide 2.2%Straw Man: Speaker 3.3%, sitewide 0.9%Circular Reasoning: Speaker 3.1%, sitewide 0.1%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 2.9%, sitewide 1.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 1.1%, sitewide 2.7%Personal Incredulity: Speaker 2.6%, sitewide 0.2%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 2.4%, sitewide 1.9%Representativeness Heuristic: Speaker 1.9%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos