Speaker summary
86%4 analyzed articles/videos198 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Let’s Go Washington results contain 16 faulty reasoning types, including Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, Bandwagon, and Straw Man, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 40% saturation with 106 hits. Analysis detected 873 faulty-reasoning hits from 198 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 22.5% and a BS Rank of 39% (28,088 of 45,717 speakers). This Let’s Go Washington is better (less manipulative) than 61.40% of the peer group.
Let’s Go Washington
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
0%Paul Heideman1%
0%The Brookings Institution1%
0%Conor Heffernan1%
0%Gen Jack Keane1%
0%Katy Longshore1%
39%Let’s Go Washington (selected)23%
100%291 Brewhouse100%
100%21 Grams100%
100%2035 Initiative100%
100%1X representative100%
100%1455 Storytelling Arts100%
Speaker details
Total words: 198
Article count: 4
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

39% percentile
025507510038.6% percentile
22.5% BS Score4 analyzed videos198 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Straw ManSitewide 0.9%Speaker 59.5%59.5%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Speaker 30.9%30.9%BandwagonSitewide 2.2%Speaker 30.9%30.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 29.4%29.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 29.4%29.4%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Speaker 14.7%14.7%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 40.0%40.0%Slippery SlopeSitewide 1.7%Speaker 14.7%14.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 29.4%29.4%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Speaker 9.4%9.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Straw Man: Speaker 59.5%, sitewide 0.9%Framing Effect: Speaker 40.0%, sitewide 26.9%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Speaker 30.9%, sitewide 0.5%Bandwagon: Speaker 30.9%, sitewide 2.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 29.4%, sitewide 0.8%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 29.4%, sitewide 15.9%Negativity Bias: Speaker 29.4%, sitewide 19.2%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 14.7%, sitewide 5.3%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 14.7%, sitewide 7.5%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Speaker 14.7%, sitewide 1.4%Slippery Slope: Speaker 14.7%, sitewide 1.7%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 10.9%, sitewide 9.1%In-Group Bias: Speaker 10.6%, sitewide 6.9%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 10.6%, sitewide 3.7%Indoctrination: Speaker 9.4%, sitewide 0.0%Optimism Bias: Speaker 9.4%, sitewide 6.0%Straw ManSitewide rateSpeaker rate