Speaker summary
⁠44%1 analyzed article/video55.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Leila Wilson results contain 3 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias and Framing Effect, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 71.9% saturation with 64 hits. Analysis detected 94 faulty-reasoning hits from 55.333 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 35.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠57% (19,751 of 45,144 speakers). This Leila Wilson is worse (more manipulative) than 56.30% of the peer group.
Leila Wilson
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%Paul Heideman1%
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Conor Heffernan1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%Katy Longshore1%
⁠57%Leila Wilson (selected)36%
⁠100%291 Brewhouse100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%2035 Initiative100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
⁠100%1455 Storytelling Arts100%
Speaker details
Total words: 55.333
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

56% percentile
025507510056.3% percentile
35.2% BS Score1 analyzed videos55.3 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–100%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 71.9%71.9%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 6.7%6.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 27.0%27.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 71.9%, sitewide 15.9%Negativity Bias: Speaker 27.0%, sitewide 19.2%Framing Effect: Speaker 6.7%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos