Speaker summary
33%1 analyzed article/video275.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Lana Williams results contain 9 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias, Unattributed Quote, and Pessimism Bias, with Ambiguity (Equivocation) as the most egregious example at 8.4% saturation with 39 hits. Analysis detected 284 faulty-reasoning hits from 275.333 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 6.8% and a BS Rank of 7% (42,359 of 45,144 speakers). This Lana Williams is better (less manipulative) than 93.80% of the peer group.
Lana Williams
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
0%Paul Heideman1%
0%The Brookings Institution1%
0%Conor Heffernan1%
0%Gen Jack Keane1%
0%Katy Longshore1%
7%Lana Williams (selected)7%
100%291 Brewhouse100%
100%21 Grams100%
100%2035 Initiative100%
100%1X representative100%
100%1455 Storytelling Arts100%
Speaker details
Total words: 275.333
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

6% percentile
02550751006.2% percentile
6.8% BS Score1 analyzed videos275.3 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–25%
0.0%5%10%15%20%25%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 3.0%3.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 8.4%8.4%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 8.4%8.4%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Speaker 7.6%7.6%Status Quo BiasSitewide 2.2%Speaker 7.6%7.6%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Speaker 6.5%6.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Speaker 6.9%6.9%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 4.5%4.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 8.4%8.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%5%5%10%10%15%15%20%20%25%25%Negativity Bias: Speaker 3.0%, sitewide 19.2%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 6.9%, sitewide 9.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 8.4%, sitewide 0.8%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 8.4%, sitewide 7.5%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 8.4%, sitewide 1.1%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 7.6%, sitewide 1.9%Status Quo Bias: Speaker 7.6%, sitewide 2.2%False Dilemma: Speaker 6.5%, sitewide 1.5%Optimism Bias: Speaker 4.5%, sitewide 6.0%Negativity BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos