Speaker summary
⁠40%1 analyzed article/video66.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Laila Jean-Baptiste results contain 5 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect, Appeal to Emotion, and Optimism Bias, with Composition/Division as the most egregious example at 24.6% saturation with 28 hits. Analysis detected 113 faulty-reasoning hits from 66.667 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 19.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠34% (29,924 of 45,145 speakers). This Laila Jean-Baptiste is better (less manipulative) than 66.30% of the peer group.
Laila Jean-Baptiste
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%Paul Heideman1%
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Conor Heffernan1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%Katy Longshore1%
⁠34%Laila Jean-Baptiste (selected)20%
⁠100%291 Brewhouse100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%2035 Initiative100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
⁠100%1455 Storytelling Arts100%
Speaker details
Total words: 66.667
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

34% percentile
025507510033.7% percentile
19.8% BS Score1 analyzed videos66.7 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Composition/DivisionSitewide 0.2%Speaker 24.6%24.6%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 24.6%24.6%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 21.1%21.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 21.1%21.1%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 7.9%7.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Composition/Division: Speaker 24.6%, sitewide 0.2%Halo Effect: Speaker 24.6%, sitewide 6.7%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 21.1%, sitewide 15.9%Optimism Bias: Speaker 21.1%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Speaker 7.9%, sitewide 5.2%Composition/DivisionSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos