Speaker summary
⁠52%3 analyzed articles/videos42.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Kremlin results contain 3 faulty reasoning types, including Tu Quoque and Optimism Bias, with In-Group Bias as the most egregious example at 60.3% saturation with 35 hits. Analysis detected 82 faulty-reasoning hits from 42.667 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 51.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠74% (11,859 of 45,145 speakers). This Kremlin is worse (more manipulative) than 73.70% of the peer group.
Kremlin
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%Paul Heideman1%
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Conor Heffernan1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%Katy Longshore1%
⁠74%Kremlin (selected)52%
⁠100%291 Brewhouse100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%2035 Initiative100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
⁠100%1455 Storytelling Arts100%

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

74% percentile
025507510073.7% percentile
51.7% BS Score3 analyzed videos42.7 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Tu QuoqueSitewide 0.2%Speaker 60.3%60.3%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Speaker 60.3%60.3%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 34.3%34.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%In-Group Bias: Speaker 60.3%, sitewide 6.9%Tu Quoque: Speaker 60.3%, sitewide 0.2%Optimism Bias: Speaker 34.3%, sitewide 6.0%In-Group BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos