Speaker summary
⁠46%3 analyzed articles/videos37.5 analyzed words
BS Summary: These KQED podcast team results contain 1 faulty reasoning type, including Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 50% saturation with 25 hits. Analysis detected 25 faulty-reasoning hits from 37.5 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 50% and a BS Rank of ⁠70% (13,681 of 45,145 speakers). This KQED podcast team is worse (more manipulative) than 69.70% of the peer group.
KQED podcast team
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%Paul Heideman1%
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Conor Heffernan1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%Katy Longshore1%
⁠70%KQED podcast team (selected)50%
⁠100%291 Brewhouse100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%2035 Initiative100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
⁠100%1455 Storytelling Arts100%
Speaker details
Total words: 37.5
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

70% percentile
025507510069.7% percentile
50.0% BS Score3 analyzed videos37.5 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Speaker 50.0%50.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 0.5%Attempt to Sell a Product or ServiceSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos