Speaker summary
⁠46%1 analyzed article/video40.5 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Kevin Olickal results contain 5 faulty reasoning types, including Bandwagon, Negativity Bias, and Politically Left Leaning Bias, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 50% saturation with 27 hits. Analysis detected 135 faulty-reasoning hits from 40.5 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 50% and a BS Rank of ⁠70% (13,648 of 45,145 speakers). This Kevin Olickal is worse (more manipulative) than 69.80% of the peer group.
Kevin Olickal
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%Paul Heideman1%
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Conor Heffernan1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%Katy Longshore1%
⁠70%Kevin Olickal (selected)50%
⁠100%291 Brewhouse100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%2035 Initiative100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
⁠100%1455 Storytelling Arts100%
Speaker details
Total words: 40.5
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

70% percentile
025507510069.8% percentile
50.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos40.5 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Speaker 50.0%50.0%BandwagonSitewide 2.2%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 50.0%50.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 15.9%Bandwagon: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 2.2%Negativity Bias: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 19.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 2.0%Recency Bias: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 2.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos