Speaker summary
41%2 analyzed articles/videos385.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Kevan Parekh results contain 7 faulty reasoning types, including Self-Serving Bias, Appeal to Authority, and Hasty Generalization, with Post Hoc (False Cause) as the most egregious example at 25.7% saturation with 162 hits. Analysis detected 428.181 faulty-reasoning hits from 385.667 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 9.9% and a BS Rank of 13% (39,516 of 45,144 speakers). This Kevan Parekh is better (less manipulative) than 87.50% of the peer group.
Kevan Parekh
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
0%Paul Heideman1%
0%The Brookings Institution1%
0%Conor Heffernan1%
0%Gen Jack Keane1%
0%Katy Longshore1%
13%Kevan Parekh (selected)10%
100%291 Brewhouse100%
100%21 Grams100%
100%2035 Initiative100%
100%1X representative100%
100%1455 Storytelling Arts100%
Speaker details
Total words: 385.667
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

13% percentile
025507510012.5% percentile
9.9% BS Score2 analyzed videos385.7 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Speaker 25.7%25.7%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Speaker 23.8%23.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 1.3%1.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 5.7%5.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 3.2%3.2%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 5.7%5.7%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 3.8%3.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 25.7%, sitewide 3.3%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 23.8%, sitewide 3.7%Negativity Bias: Speaker 1.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 5.7%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 5.7%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 3.2%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Speaker 3.8%, sitewide 6.0%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide rateSpeaker rate