Speaker summary
⁠82%1 analyzed article/video54.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Kenyatta Johnson results contain 4 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect, In-Group Bias, and Self-Serving Bias, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 82 hits. Analysis detected 210.125 faulty-reasoning hits from 54.667 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 68.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠81% (8,508 of 43,726 speakers). This Kenyatta Johnson is worse (more manipulative) than 80.50% of the peer group.
Kenyatta Johnson
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%Paul Heideman1%
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Conor Heffernan1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%Katy Longshore1%
⁠81%Kenyatta Johnson (selected)69%
⁠100%291 Brewhouse100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%2035 Initiative100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
⁠100%1455 Storytelling Arts100%
Speaker details
Total words: 54.667
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

81% percentile
025507510080.5% percentile
68.8% BS Score1 analyzed videos54.7 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 75.0%75.0%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Speaker 50.0%50.0%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Speaker 50.0%50.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 15.9%Halo Effect: Speaker 75.0%, sitewide 6.7%In-Group Bias: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 6.9%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 3.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos