Speaker summary
34% 2 analyzed articles/videos 802.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Kelsey Grammer results contain 18 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority , Appeal to Emotion , and Attempt to Sell a Product or Service , with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 8.2% saturation with 105 hits . Analysis detected 697.026 faulty-reasoning hits from 802.333 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.2% and a BS Rank of 1% (43,258 of 43,701 speakers). This Kelsey Grammer is better (less manipulative) than 99.00% of the peer group. Kelsey Grammer
Speaker details
Total words: 802.333
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
1% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 1.0% percentile 3.2% BS Score2 analyzed videos802.3 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–25%
0.0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Speaker 5.4% 5.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Speaker 1.2% 1.2% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Speaker 1.2% 1.2% Attempt to Sell a Product… Sitewide 0.5% Speaker 5.4% 5.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Speaker 7.0% 7.0% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Speaker 0.6% 0.6% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Speaker 2.7% 2.7% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Speaker 8.2% 8.2% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Speaker 3.8% 3.8% Representativeness Heuris… Sitewide 1.9% Speaker 4.1% 4.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 5% 5% 10% 10% 15% 15% 20% 20% 25% 25% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 5.4%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Speaker 7.0%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Speaker 1.2%, sitewide 9.1% Anecdotal: Speaker 8.2%, sitewide 5.2% Hasty Generalization: Speaker 6.2%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Speaker 1.2%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Speaker 3.8%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Speaker 2.7%, sitewide 6.0% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Speaker 5.4%, sitewide 0.5% Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 0.6%, sitewide 4.6% Representativeness Heuristic: Speaker 4.1%, sitewide 1.9% Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 1.8%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 3.2%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 2.6%, sitewide 0.8% Hindsight Bias: Speaker 2.2%, sitewide 1.4% False Dilemma: Speaker 0.5%, sitewide 1.5% Unattributed Quote: Speaker 0.7%, sitewide 1.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst