Speaker summary
⁠80%1 analyzed article/video62.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Kelly Applegate results contain 5 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal, Appeal to Nature, and Indoctrination, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 86% saturation with 60.223 hits. Analysis detected 152.223 faulty-reasoning hits from 62.333 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 37% and a BS Rank of ⁠58% (18,083 of 42,611 speakers). This Kelly Applegate is worse (more manipulative) than 57.60% of the peer group.
Kelly Applegate
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%Paul Heideman1%
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Conor Heffernan1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%Katy Longshore1%
⁠58%Kelly Applegate (selected)37%
⁠100%291 Brewhouse100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%2035 Initiative100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
⁠100%1455 Storytelling Arts100%
Speaker details
Total words: 62.333
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

58% percentile
025507510057.6% percentile
37.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos62.3 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–100%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 86.0%86.0%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Speaker 24.7%24.7%Appeal to NatureSitewide 0.2%Speaker 24.7%24.7%Loss AversionSitewide 2.5%Speaker 24.7%24.7%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 24.7%24.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 86.0%, sitewide 15.9%Anecdotal: Speaker 24.7%, sitewide 5.2%Appeal to Nature: Speaker 24.7%, sitewide 0.2%Indoctrination: Speaker 24.7%, sitewide 0.0%Loss Aversion: Speaker 24.7%, sitewide 2.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos