Speaker summary
⁠67%5 analyzed articles/videos209 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Keila Vizcarra results contain 4 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Availability Heuristic, and Recency Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 51.1% saturation with 118.067 hits. Analysis detected 291.5 faulty-reasoning hits from 209 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 29.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠49% (22,976 of 44,967 speakers). This Keila Vizcarra is better (less manipulative) than 51.10% of the peer group.
Keila Vizcarra
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%Paul Heideman1%
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Conor Heffernan1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%Katy Longshore1%
⁠49%Keila Vizcarra (selected)30%
⁠100%291 Brewhouse100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%2035 Initiative100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
⁠100%1455 Storytelling Arts100%
Speaker details

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

49% percentile
025507510048.9% percentile
29.2% BS Score5 analyzed videos209 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 51.1%51.1%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 32.2%32.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Speaker 22.2%22.2%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Speaker 11.1%11.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Negativity Bias: Speaker 51.1%, sitewide 19.2%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 32.2%, sitewide 8.1%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 22.2%, sitewide 9.1%Recency Bias: Speaker 11.1%, sitewide 2.7%Negativity BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos