Speaker summary
⁠44%1 analyzed article/video38.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Kayla Onder results contain 3 faulty reasoning types, including Pessimism Bias and Slippery Slope, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 72.3% saturation with 34 hits. Analysis detected 102 faulty-reasoning hits from 38.333 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 72.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠82% (8,226 of 43,889 speakers). This Kayla Onder is worse (more manipulative) than 81.30% of the peer group.
Kayla Onder
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%Paul Heideman1%
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Conor Heffernan1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%Katy Longshore1%
⁠82%Kayla Onder (selected)73%
⁠100%291 Brewhouse100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%2035 Initiative100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
⁠100%1455 Storytelling Arts100%
Speaker details
Total words: 38.333
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

81% percentile
025507510081.3% percentile
72.3% BS Score1 analyzed videos38.3 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–100%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%Slippery SlopeSitewide 1.7%Speaker 72.3%72.3%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Speaker 72.3%72.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 72.3%72.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%Negativity Bias: Speaker 72.3%, sitewide 19.2%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 72.3%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Speaker 72.3%, sitewide 1.7%Negativity BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos