Speaker summary
54%1 analyzed article/video65.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Kaitlyn Schwartz results contain 5 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Post Hoc (False Cause), and Hasty Generalization, with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 46.9% saturation with 46 hits. Analysis detected 124 faulty-reasoning hits from 65.333 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 28% and a BS Rank of 48% (23,781 of 45,145 speakers). This Kaitlyn Schwartz is better (less manipulative) than 52.70% of the peer group.
Kaitlyn Schwartz
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
0%Paul Heideman1%
0%The Brookings Institution1%
0%Conor Heffernan1%
0%Gen Jack Keane1%
0%Katy Longshore1%
48%Kaitlyn Schwartz (selected)28%
100%291 Brewhouse100%
100%21 Grams100%
100%2035 Initiative100%
100%1X representative100%
100%1455 Storytelling Arts100%
Speaker details
Total words: 65.333
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

47% percentile
025507510047.3% percentile
28.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos65.3 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 46.9%46.9%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Speaker 26.5%26.5%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 26.5%26.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 26.5%26.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Speaker 13.3%13.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Anecdotal: Speaker 46.9%, sitewide 5.2%Negativity Bias: Speaker 26.5%, sitewide 19.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 26.5%, sitewide 3.3%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 26.5%, sitewide 8.1%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 13.3%, sitewide 9.1%AnecdotalSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos