Speaker summary
42%2 analyzed articles/videos74 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Kaitlin Collins results contain 3 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority and Recency Bias, with Ambiguity (Equivocation) as the most egregious example at 42.3% saturation with 44 hits. Analysis detected 132 faulty-reasoning hits from 74 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 42.3% and a BS Rank of 63% (16,946 of 45,123 speakers). This Kaitlin Collins is worse (more manipulative) than 62.40% of the peer group.
Kaitlin Collins
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
0%Paul Heideman1%
0%The Brookings Institution1%
0%Conor Heffernan1%
0%Gen Jack Keane1%
0%Katy Longshore1%
63%Kaitlin Collins (selected)43%
100%291 Brewhouse100%
100%21 Grams100%
100%2035 Initiative100%
100%1X representative100%
100%1455 Storytelling Arts100%
Speaker details
Total words: 74
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

62% percentile
025507510062.4% percentile
42.3% BS Score2 analyzed videos74 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 42.3%42.3%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Speaker 42.3%42.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 42.3%42.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 42.3%, sitewide 0.8%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 42.3%, sitewide 11.1%Recency Bias: Speaker 42.3%, sitewide 2.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos