Speaker summary
⁠49%2 analyzed articles/videos418 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Justin Lo results contain 12 faulty reasoning types, including Ambiguity (Equivocation), Unattributed Quote, and False Dilemma, with Overconfidence Bias as the most egregious example at 15% saturation with 99 hits. Analysis detected 602.375 faulty-reasoning hits from 418 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 9.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠13% (39,610 of 45,134 speakers). This Justin Lo is better (less manipulative) than 87.80% of the peer group.
Justin Lo
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%Paul Heideman1%
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Conor Heffernan1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%Katy Longshore1%
⁠13%Justin Lo (selected)10%
⁠100%291 Brewhouse100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%2035 Initiative100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
⁠100%1455 Storytelling Arts100%
Speaker details
Total words: 418
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

12% percentile
025507510012.2% percentile
9.8% BS Score2 analyzed videos418 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Speaker 23.5%23.5%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 11.7%11.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 14.4%14.4%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Speaker 15.0%15.0%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 9.7%9.7%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Speaker 8.2%8.2%Slippery SlopeSitewide 1.7%Speaker 5.5%5.5%Fundamental Attribution E…Sitewide 2.7%Speaker 4.7%4.7%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 5.0%5.0%Loss AversionSitewide 2.5%Speaker 3.5%3.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Speaker 11.7%, sitewide 26.9%False Dilemma: Speaker 23.5%, sitewide 1.5%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 15.0%, sitewide 4.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 14.4%, sitewide 0.8%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 9.7%, sitewide 1.1%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 8.2%, sitewide 8.1%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 8.2%, sitewide 1.9%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 7.9%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Speaker 5.0%, sitewide 6.0%Slippery Slope: Speaker 5.5%, sitewide 1.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 4.7%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Speaker 3.5%, sitewide 2.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos