Speaker summary
61% 2 analyzed articles/videos 494 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jonathan Alpert results contain 16 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Straw Man , and Politically Right Leaning Bias , with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 34.8% saturation with 199.595 hits . Analysis detected 901.04 faulty-reasoning hits from 494 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 8.9% and a BS Rank of 11% (40,975 of 45,771 speakers). This Jonathan Alpert is better (less manipulative) than 89.50% of the peer group. Jonathan Alpert
Speaker details
Total words: 494
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
11% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 10.5% percentile 8.9% BS Score2 analyzed videos494 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Speaker 34.8% 34.8% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Speaker 4.0% 4.0% Straw Man Sitewide 0.9% Speaker 16.9% 16.9% Politically Right Leaning… Sitewide 1.4% Speaker 9.0% 9.0% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Speaker 11.3% 11.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Speaker 5.8% 5.8% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias Sitewide 3.1% Speaker 7.2% 7.2% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Speaker 6.9% 6.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Speaker 22.1% 22.1% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Speaker 2.6% 2.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Hasty Generalization: Speaker 34.8%, sitewide 8.1% Framing Effect: Speaker 4.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Speaker 22.1%, sitewide 19.2% Straw Man: Speaker 16.9%, sitewide 0.9% Anecdotal: Speaker 11.3%, sitewide 5.2% Appeal to Authority: Speaker 5.8%, sitewide 11.1% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Speaker 9.0%, sitewide 1.4% Confirmation Bias: Speaker 8.1%, sitewide 7.5% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Speaker 7.2%, sitewide 3.1% Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 6.9%, sitewide 3.3% Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 2.6%, sitewide 5.3% Hindsight Bias: Speaker 3.7%, sitewide 1.4% False Dilemma: Speaker 3.6%, sitewide 1.5% Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 3.3%, sitewide 2.7% Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 1.9%, sitewide 0.0% Pessimism Bias: Speaker 1.6%, sitewide 1.9% Hasty Generalization Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst