Speaker summary
⁠95%1 analyzed article/video25 analyzed words
BS Summary: These JOHN SOLOMON results contain 6 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias, Framing Effect, and Negativity Bias, with Burden of Proof as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 25 hits. Analysis detected 150 faulty-reasoning hits from 25 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 100% and a BS Rank of ⁠93% (3,187 of 45,145 speakers). This JOHN SOLOMON is worse (more manipulative) than 92.90% of the peer group.
JOHN SOLOMON
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%Paul Heideman1%
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Conor Heffernan1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%Katy Longshore1%
⁠93%JOHN SOLOMON (selected)100%
⁠100%291 Brewhouse100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%2035 Initiative100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
⁠100%1455 Storytelling Arts100%
Speaker details
Total words: 25
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

93% percentile
025507510092.9% percentile
100.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos25 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Burden of ProofSitewide 0.4%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 100.0%100.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Burden of Proof: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 0.4%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 7.5%Framing Effect: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 19.2%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 0.0%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 1.1%Burden of ProofSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos