Speaker summary
⁠78%1 analyzed article/video57.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These JoAnne Gonzales results contain 5 faulty reasoning types, including False Dilemma, Appeal to Emotion, and Begging the Question, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 87.4% saturation with 59.414 hits. Analysis detected 217.121 faulty-reasoning hits from 57.667 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 53.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠75% (11,511 of 45,339 speakers). This JoAnne Gonzales is worse (more manipulative) than 74.60% of the peer group.
JoAnne Gonzales
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%Paul Heideman1%
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Conor Heffernan1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%Katy Longshore1%
⁠75%JoAnne Gonzales (selected)54%
⁠100%291 Brewhouse100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%2035 Initiative100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
⁠100%1455 Storytelling Arts100%
Speaker details
Total words: 57.667
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

75% percentile
025507510074.6% percentile
53.6% BS Score1 analyzed videos57.7 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–100%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Speaker 68.7%68.7%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 87.4%87.4%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Speaker 37.4%37.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 37.4%37.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 37.4%37.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%Framing Effect: Speaker 87.4%, sitewide 26.9%False Dilemma: Speaker 68.7%, sitewide 1.5%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 37.4%, sitewide 15.9%Begging the Question: Speaker 37.4%, sitewide 1.7%Negativity Bias: Speaker 37.4%, sitewide 19.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos