Speaker summary
83% 2 analyzed articles/videos 240 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jeremy Hollingshead results contain 9 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal , Hasty Generalization , and Optimism Bias , with Availability Heuristic as the most egregious example at 55.9% saturation with 143.144 hits . Analysis detected 599.815 faulty-reasoning hits from 240 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 23.2% and a BS Rank of 40% (27,017 of 44,787 speakers). This Jeremy Hollingshead is better (less manipulative) than 60.30% of the peer group. Jeremy Hollingshead
Speaker details
Total words: 240
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
40% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 39.7% percentile 23.2% BS Score2 analyzed videos240 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–75%
0.0% 20% 40% 60% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Speaker 55.9% 55.9% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Speaker 47.9% 47.9% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Speaker 27.1% 27.1% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Speaker 27.3% 27.3% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Speaker 14.0% 14.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Speaker 13.0% 13.0% Representativeness Heuris… Sitewide 1.9% Speaker 8.1% 8.1% Loss Aversion Sitewide 2.5% Speaker 7.8% 7.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Speaker 7.8% 7.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 20% 20% 40% 40% 60% 60% Availability Heuristic: Speaker 55.9%, sitewide 9.1% Anecdotal: Speaker 47.9%, sitewide 5.2% Hasty Generalization: Speaker 27.3%, sitewide 8.1% Optimism Bias: Speaker 27.1%, sitewide 6.0% Negativity Bias: Speaker 13.0%, sitewide 19.2% Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 14.0%, sitewide 4.6% Representativeness Heuristic: Speaker 8.1%, sitewide 1.9% Confirmation Bias: Speaker 7.8%, sitewide 7.5% Loss Aversion: Speaker 7.8%, sitewide 2.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst