Speaker summary
⁠38%1 analyzed article/video42.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Janie Williamson results contain 4 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Negativity Bias, and Slippery Slope, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 50% saturation with 32 hits. Analysis detected 80 faulty-reasoning hits from 42.667 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 31.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠52% (21,887 of 45,145 speakers). This Janie Williamson is worse (more manipulative) than 51.50% of the peer group.
Janie Williamson
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%Paul Heideman1%
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Conor Heffernan1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%Katy Longshore1%
⁠52%Janie Williamson (selected)32%
⁠100%291 Brewhouse100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%2035 Initiative100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
⁠100%1455 Storytelling Arts100%
Speaker details
Total words: 42.667
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

52% percentile
025507510051.5% percentile
31.3% BS Score1 analyzed videos42.7 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Slippery SlopeSitewide 1.7%Speaker 25.0%25.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 25.0%25.0%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 25.0%25.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 15.9%Framing Effect: Speaker 25.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Speaker 25.0%, sitewide 19.2%Slippery Slope: Speaker 25.0%, sitewide 1.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos