Speaker summary
⁠71%1 analyzed article/video42 analyzed words
BS Summary: These James Leibold results contain 3 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias and Pessimism Bias, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 42 hits. Analysis detected 126 faulty-reasoning hits from 42 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 100% and a BS Rank of ⁠94% (2,984 of 45,145 speakers). This James Leibold is worse (more manipulative) than 93.40% of the peer group.
James Leibold
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%Paul Heideman1%
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Conor Heffernan1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%Katy Longshore1%
⁠94%James Leibold (selected)100%
⁠100%291 Brewhouse100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%2035 Initiative100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
⁠100%1455 Storytelling Arts100%
Speaker details
Total words: 42
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

93% percentile
025507510093.4% percentile
100.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos42 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 100.0%100.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 8.1%Negativity Bias: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 19.2%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 1.9%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos