Speaker summary
62%2 analyzed articles/videos264 analyzed words
BS Summary: These James Kirchick results contain 18 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Ad Hominem, and Appeal to Authority, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 72.2% saturation with 333 hits. Analysis detected 1,295.809 faulty-reasoning hits from 264 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 16.9% and a BS Rank of 29% (32,317 of 45,061 speakers). This James Kirchick is better (less manipulative) than 71.70% of the peer group.
James Kirchick
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
0%Paul Heideman1%
0%The Brookings Institution1%
0%Conor Heffernan1%
0%Gen Jack Keane1%
0%Katy Longshore1%
29%James Kirchick (selected)17%
100%291 Brewhouse100%
100%21 Grams100%
100%2035 Initiative100%
100%1X representative100%
100%1455 Storytelling Arts100%
Speaker details
Total words: 264
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

28% percentile
025507510028.3% percentile
16.9% BS Score2 analyzed videos264 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–100%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 72.2%72.2%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Speaker 31.9%31.9%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 56.2%56.2%Composition/DivisionSitewide 0.2%Speaker 14.1%14.1%Slippery SlopeSitewide 1.7%Speaker 11.9%11.9%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 17.3%17.3%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Speaker 10.2%10.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 18.4%18.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 11.9%11.9%Straw ManSitewide 0.9%Speaker 7.6%7.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 72.2%, sitewide 15.9%Framing Effect: Speaker 56.2%, sitewide 26.9%Ad Hominem: Speaker 31.9%, sitewide 2.2%Negativity Bias: Speaker 11.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 18.4%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 17.3%, sitewide 8.1%Composition/Division: Speaker 14.1%, sitewide 0.2%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 14.1%, sitewide 7.5%Slippery Slope: Speaker 11.9%, sitewide 1.7%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 11.1%, sitewide 5.3%False Dilemma: Speaker 10.2%, sitewide 1.5%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 5.0%, sitewide 9.1%Straw Man: Speaker 7.6%, sitewide 0.9%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Speaker 6.7%, sitewide 2.0%Genetic Fallacy: Speaker 5.0%, sitewide 1.4%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 5.0%, sitewide 1.1%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 4.3%, sitewide 0.0%Indoctrination: Speaker 1.7%, sitewide 0.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos