Speaker summary
⁠83%1 analyzed article/video70.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ignazio La Russa results contain 4 faulty reasoning types, including False Dilemma, Appeal to Authority, and Fundamental Attribution Error, with In-Group Bias as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 79.5 hits. Analysis detected 238.5 faulty-reasoning hits from 70.667 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 75% and a BS Rank of ⁠83% (7,981 of 45,125 speakers). This Ignazio La Russa is worse (more manipulative) than 82.30% of the peer group.
Ignazio La Russa
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%Paul Heideman1%
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Conor Heffernan1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%Katy Longshore1%
⁠83%Ignazio La Russa (selected)75%
⁠100%291 Brewhouse100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%2035 Initiative100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
⁠100%1455 Storytelling Arts100%
Speaker details
Total words: 70.667
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

82% percentile
025507510082.3% percentile
75.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos70.7 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Speaker 100.0%100.0%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Fundamental Attribution E…Sitewide 2.7%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 50.0%50.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%In-Group Bias: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 6.9%False Dilemma: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 1.5%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 11.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 2.7%In-Group BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos