Speaker summary
⁠47%1 analyzed article/video226.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Hudson Leogrande results contain 6 faulty reasoning types, including Self-Serving Bias, Confirmation Bias, and Post Hoc (False Cause), with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 17.4% saturation with 66 hits. Analysis detected 205.971 faulty-reasoning hits from 226.667 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 10.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠14% (39,081 of 45,145 speakers). This Hudson Leogrande is better (less manipulative) than 86.60% of the peer group.
Hudson Leogrande
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%Paul Heideman1%
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Conor Heffernan1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%Katy Longshore1%
⁠14%Hudson Leogrande (selected)11%
⁠100%291 Brewhouse100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%2035 Initiative100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
⁠100%1455 Storytelling Arts100%
Speaker details
Total words: 226.667
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

13% percentile
025507510013.4% percentile
10.3% BS Score1 analyzed videos226.7 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Speaker 24.9%24.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 2.4%2.4%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 17.4%17.4%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 0.8%0.8%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Speaker 8.2%8.2%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 8.2%8.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 24.9%, sitewide 3.7%Anecdotal: Speaker 17.4%, sitewide 5.2%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 2.4%, sitewide 15.9%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 8.2%, sitewide 7.5%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 8.2%, sitewide 3.3%Optimism Bias: Speaker 0.8%, sitewide 6.0%Self-Serving BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos