Speaker summary
⁠63%1 analyzed article/video79 analyzed words
BS Summary: These @GOP__Ls results contain 4 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Biased Writer Voice, and Confirmation Bias, with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 43% saturation with 34 hits. Analysis detected 136 faulty-reasoning hits from 79 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 43% and a BS Rank of ⁠63% (16,736 of 45,111 speakers). This @GOP__Ls is worse (more manipulative) than 62.90% of the peer group.
@GOP__Ls
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%Paul Heideman1%
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Conor Heffernan1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%Katy Longshore1%
⁠63%@GOP__Ls (selected)44%
⁠100%291 Brewhouse100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%2035 Initiative100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
⁠100%1455 Storytelling Arts100%
Speaker details
Total words: 79
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

63% percentile
025507510062.9% percentile
43.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos79 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 43.0%43.0%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Speaker 43.0%43.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 43.0%43.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 43.0%43.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Anecdotal: Speaker 43.0%, sitewide 5.2%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 43.0%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 43.0%, sitewide 5.3%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 43.0%, sitewide 7.5%AnecdotalSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos