Speaker summary
83%1 analyzed article/video424.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Gary Brucato results contain 20 faulty reasoning types, including Ambiguity (Equivocation), Confirmation Bias, and Overconfidence Bias, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 31.1% saturation with 210 hits. Analysis detected 1,584.748 faulty-reasoning hits from 424.667 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 14.2% and a BS Rank of 23% (35,009 of 45,128 speakers). This Gary Brucato is better (less manipulative) than 77.60% of the peer group.
Gary Brucato
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
0%Paul Heideman1%
0%The Brookings Institution1%
0%Conor Heffernan1%
0%Gen Jack Keane1%
0%Katy Longshore1%
23%Gary Brucato (selected)15%
100%291 Brewhouse100%
100%21 Grams100%
100%2035 Initiative100%
100%1X representative100%
100%1455 Storytelling Arts100%
Speaker details
Total words: 424.667
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

22% percentile
025507510022.4% percentile
14.2% BS Score1 analyzed videos424.7 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 42.5%42.5%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Speaker 38.6%38.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 30.9%30.9%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 35.8%35.8%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Speaker 31.1%31.1%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 5.0%5.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 7.1%7.1%Fundamental Attribution E…Sitewide 2.7%Speaker 14.2%14.2%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Speaker 9.6%9.6%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Speaker 11.7%11.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 42.5%, sitewide 7.5%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 38.6%, sitewide 4.6%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 35.8%, sitewide 8.1%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 31.1%, sitewide 5.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 30.9%, sitewide 0.8%Framing Effect: Speaker 5.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Speaker 7.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 11.2%, sitewide 15.9%Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 14.2%, sitewide 2.7%Anchoring Bias: Speaker 11.7%, sitewide 4.0%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 10.5%, sitewide 11.1%Begging the Question: Speaker 9.6%, sitewide 1.7%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 5.0%, sitewide 9.1%Representativeness Heuristic: Speaker 5.5%, sitewide 1.9%Indoctrination: Speaker 5.0%, sitewide 0.0%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Speaker 5.0%, sitewide 3.1%Red Herring: Speaker 5.0%, sitewide 0.7%Burden of Proof: Speaker 3.9%, sitewide 0.4%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 3.1%, sitewide 3.3%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 3.1%, sitewide 1.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos