Speaker summary
83% 1 analyzed article/video 424.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Gary Brucato results contain 20 faulty reasoning types, including Ambiguity (Equivocation) , Confirmation Bias , and Overconfidence Bias , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 31.1% saturation with 210 hits . Analysis detected 1,584.748 faulty-reasoning hits from 424.667 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 14.2% and a BS Rank of 23% (35,009 of 45,128 speakers). This Gary Brucato is better (less manipulative) than 77.60% of the peer group. Gary Brucato
Speaker details
Total words: 424.667
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
22% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 22.4% percentile 14.2% BS Score1 analyzed videos424.7 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Speaker SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Speaker 42.5% 42.5% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Speaker 38.6% 38.6% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Speaker 30.9% 30.9% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Speaker 35.8% 35.8% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Speaker 31.1% 31.1% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Speaker 5.0% 5.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Speaker 7.1% 7.1% Fundamental Attribution E… Sitewide 2.7% Speaker 14.2% 14.2% Begging the Question Sitewide 1.7% Speaker 9.6% 9.6% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Speaker 11.7% 11.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Confirmation Bias: Speaker 42.5%, sitewide 7.5% Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 38.6%, sitewide 4.6% Hasty Generalization: Speaker 35.8%, sitewide 8.1% Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 31.1%, sitewide 5.3% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 30.9%, sitewide 0.8% Framing Effect: Speaker 5.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Speaker 7.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 11.2%, sitewide 15.9% Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 14.2%, sitewide 2.7% Anchoring Bias: Speaker 11.7%, sitewide 4.0% Appeal to Authority: Speaker 10.5%, sitewide 11.1% Begging the Question: Speaker 9.6%, sitewide 1.7% Availability Heuristic: Speaker 5.0%, sitewide 9.1% Representativeness Heuristic: Speaker 5.5%, sitewide 1.9% Indoctrination: Speaker 5.0%, sitewide 0.0% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Speaker 5.0%, sitewide 3.1% Red Herring: Speaker 5.0%, sitewide 0.7% Burden of Proof: Speaker 3.9%, sitewide 0.4% Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 3.1%, sitewide 3.3% Pessimism Bias: Speaker 3.1%, sitewide 1.9% Confirmation Bias Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst