Speaker summary
⁠84%1 analyzed article/video281 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Flan results contain 10 faulty reasoning types, including In-Group Bias, Optimism Bias, and Anecdotal, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 38.8% saturation with 109 hits. Analysis detected 477 faulty-reasoning hits from 281 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 17% and a BS Rank of ⁠29% (31,986 of 44,624 speakers). This Flan is better (less manipulative) than 71.70% of the peer group.
Flan
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%Paul Heideman1%
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Conor Heffernan1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%Katy Longshore1%
⁠29%Flan (selected)17%
⁠100%291 Brewhouse100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%2035 Initiative100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
⁠100%1455 Storytelling Arts100%
Speaker details
Total words: 281
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

28% percentile
025507510028.3% percentile
17.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos281 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 38.8%38.8%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Speaker 29.5%29.5%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 4.6%4.6%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 23.8%23.8%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 24.2%24.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Speaker 23.8%23.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 9.3%9.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 4.6%4.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 9.3%9.3%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Speaker 1.8%1.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 38.8%, sitewide 15.9%In-Group Bias: Speaker 29.5%, sitewide 6.9%Framing Effect: Speaker 4.6%, sitewide 26.9%Optimism Bias: Speaker 24.2%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Speaker 23.8%, sitewide 5.2%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 23.8%, sitewide 9.1%Negativity Bias: Speaker 9.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 9.3%, sitewide 11.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 4.6%, sitewide 0.8%Begging the Question: Speaker 1.8%, sitewide 1.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos