Speaker summary
78%1 analyzed article/video98 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Elite Exped results contain 6 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Indoctrination, and Loss Aversion, with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 60.9% saturation with 70.013 hits. Analysis detected 199.967 faulty-reasoning hits from 98 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 25.6% and a BS Rank of 44% (25,352 of 45,145 speakers). This Elite Exped is better (less manipulative) than 56.20% of the peer group.
Elite Exped
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
0%Paul Heideman1%
0%The Brookings Institution1%
0%Conor Heffernan1%
0%Gen Jack Keane1%
0%Katy Longshore1%
44%Elite Exped (selected)26%
100%291 Brewhouse100%
100%21 Grams100%
100%2035 Initiative100%
100%1X representative100%
100%1455 Storytelling Arts100%
Speaker details
Total words: 98
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

44% percentile
025507510043.8% percentile
25.6% BS Score1 analyzed videos98 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 60.9%60.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 46.0%46.0%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Speaker 12.1%12.1%Loss AversionSitewide 2.5%Speaker 12.1%12.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 12.1%12.1%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Speaker 10.2%10.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Halo Effect: Speaker 60.9%, sitewide 6.7%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 46.0%, sitewide 15.9%Negativity Bias: Speaker 12.1%, sitewide 19.2%Indoctrination: Speaker 12.1%, sitewide 0.0%Loss Aversion: Speaker 12.1%, sitewide 2.5%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 10.2%, sitewide 5.3%Halo EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos