Speaker summary
ā 38%1 analyzed article/video89.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Elana Pirtle-Guiney results contain 4 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Post Hoc (False Cause), and Status Quo Bias, with False Dilemma as the most egregious example at 28.2% saturation with 44 hits. Analysis detected 146 faulty-reasoning hits from 89.333 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 23.4% and a BS Rank of ā 40% (26,949 of 44,927 speakers). This Elana Pirtle-Guiney is better (less manipulative) than 60.00% of the peer group.
Elana Pirtle-Guiney
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
ā 0%Paul Heideman1%
ā 0%The Brookings Institution1%
ā 0%Conor Heffernan1%
ā 0%Gen Jack Keane1%
ā 0%Katy Longshore1%
ā 40%Elana Pirtle-Guiney (selected)24%
ā 100%291 Brewhouse100%
ā 100%21 Grams100%
ā 100%2035 Initiative100%
ā 100%1X representative100%
ā 100%1455 Storytelling Arts100%
Speaker details
Total words: 89.333
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

40% percentile
025507510040.0% percentile
23.4% BS Score1 analyzed videos89.3 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0ā€“50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Speaker 28.2%28.2%Status Quo BiasSitewide 2.2%Speaker 21.8%21.8%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Speaker 21.8%21.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 21.8%21.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%False Dilemma: Speaker 28.2%, sitewide 1.5%Negativity Bias: Speaker 21.8%, sitewide 19.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 21.8%, sitewide 3.3%Status Quo Bias: Speaker 21.8%, sitewide 2.2%False DilemmaSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos