Speaker summary
⁠83%1 analyzed article/video70.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Donald Shaw results contain 5 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Availability Heuristic, and Confirmation Bias, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 106 hits. Analysis detected 318 faulty-reasoning hits from 70.667 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 70% and a BS Rank of ⁠81% (8,652 of 45,522 speakers). This Donald Shaw is worse (more manipulative) than 81.00% of the peer group.
Donald Shaw
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%Paul Heideman1%
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Conor Heffernan1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%Katy Longshore1%
⁠81%Donald Shaw (selected)70%
⁠100%291 Brewhouse100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%2035 Initiative100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
⁠100%1455 Storytelling Arts100%
Speaker details
Total words: 70.667
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

81% percentile
025507510081.0% percentile
70.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos70.7 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Speaker 50.0%50.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 11.1%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 5.3%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 7.5%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 1.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos